CO129-068 - Sir Bowring - 1858 [5-12] — Page 287

1

were so used (page 18) Mr.

17) that

May declares (page 4)

"

to his arrain knowledge

the lot 206

ura

"

thus occupied

while in M Caldwell's

possession and had been

2 or 3 year previously.

1 fm 2

Mr. Caldwell aborentely denie's the change in that

I all other

and

caseo –

and

the Commissioners declare it

not proved again disbelieving Mr. May. In support of

the third (which is (rather than a charge)

chris a statements-

there is evidence

ann

though of

indifferent kind (pagent)

though

is not proved

q

the statements

in the opinion

the Commissovers there

seems to be a certain

122 201 Mweny

a curtain foundation

sapecting part of it (pp 29.)

284

The charge of owning

the brothe N. 48 the

Commissovers think is satiofactorily explained) but there existed strong

prima facie grounds for

making it.

The

care AAPOLO

his. The

brother stood in Mr. Caldell's

name in the Gown books and he had paix the

rent upon it almost up to the time when Ms Andaug charge

was made. This off presia facie

Course was

evidence of ownershing

Aao

Ød

and

inged by the Andy

But Mr Caldwell explained,

and D. Bridges corroborated his explanation, that he had in fact

Several

sold this and

adjoining Houses -

though

#

I